Mazars publishes CEE Tax Guide 2022
• The region’s tax wedge remains relatively wide, ranging between 15 and 51%. Countries maintain a characteristically different approach to income taxation and tax relief for families with children.
• VAT remains the prime source of tax revenues in the listed countries; digital technologies have visibly improved the efficiency of tax collection
• There are still significant differences in the approach to corporate taxation in the region. Only one country reduced its corporate profit tax rate from last year.
For the tenth consecutive year, Mazars, the international audit, tax and advisory firm, published its annual CEE Tax Guide that offers up-to-date information on taxation in 22 European countries, including labor costs, corporate profit taxation, and transfer pricing. The guide serves long-term investment decisions by analyzing long-term taxation trends and fundamental changes in the tax regimes, both in comparison with each other and to previous years.
Mazars published its comprehensive tax guide that aspires to provide up-to-date information on taxation in 22 Central and Eastern European states for the tenth time. In addition to the Visegrad Group, the guide analyses the tax regimes of the South-Eastern European countries, Germany, Austria, Moldova, Ukraine, and the Baltic States, focusing on changes and trends in the tax regimes.
“This publication will help investors understand the complexities of the various CEE tax regimes by highlighting the latest trends and tendencies that shape them” – commented Dániel H. Nagy, tax director of Mazars in Hungary.
Mazars’ analysis found that labor costs are decreasing in almost all observed countries, but the actual drop size shows significant differences. The basic approach to income taxation also varies in the region: some countries continue to enforce flat-rate income tax rates (such as Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania), while others maintain significantly progressive tax rates (e.g., Austria, Germany, and Poland).
In the listed countries, average labor costs burdening the employers amount to 15% of gross wages. Still, there are significant differences -over 30 percentage points – between the lowest, less than 5% in Romania, and the highest of over 30% (e.g., in the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovakia). This highlights that tax systems are hard to compare but also indicates whether governments prefer to shift the burden of labor costs to employees or employers.
A more practical way of comparing systems is the so-called tax wedge, which shows what percentage of total income the state takes away in taxes and contributions. It shows the extent
to which a tax on labor income discourages employment, i.e., what percentage of labor costs is paid into the state budget in some form. The indicator varies between 15 and 51% in the region, mainly depending on income levels and family status.
The countries in the region show the most significant variation in wage levels. Minimum wages in the V4 countries range between €500-€650; they are significantly lower in the Balkans and Moldova (below €400) and are not comparable to those over €1,700 in Germany and Austria.
The euro-based average wage in the private sector grew by more than 12 percent on average, totaling 14 and 19 percent in Serbia and Hungary, respectively. Average gross wages are highest in the Czech Republic among the V4 countries at around 1300 EUR.
The average monthly wage in the private sector in 2021 in Poland was EUR 1280, whilst the real growth of the average wage in 2021 compared to 2020 was 3 percent.
VAT and online invoice
Value-added taxes have undoubtedly become the prime source of revenue for central budgets in recent years. According to Mazars, this trend might reverse due to the pandemic economic recession, the war in Ukraine, and difficulties in global supply chains.
VAT rates in the region have remained stable over the past year, with standard rates averaging around 21 percent. The standard VAT rate of 25% and 27%, effective in Croatia and Hungary, respectively, remain exceptionally high. The standard VAT rate of Poland remains at the rate of 23 percent.
EU VAT rules are largely harmonized, and many non-EU countries are also trying to align with the EU system. The examined countries are also putting visible effort into improving the efficiency of tax collection, primarily by implementing new digital technology to combat abuse, as this is where the risk of tax evasion is most significant. Their objective is to monitor all affected transactions end-to-end, detect fraudulent activity and curb tax evasion.
The introduction of online cash registers and online invoice processing proved to be an effective tool in whitening the economy. Hungary continues to play a leading role in digitalization, and the recently introduced mandatory online invoice data reporting system already shows a positive fiscal impact. Similar solutions can be found in other countries of the region too, for instance, in Romania.
Digitization obligations are being introduced gradually in some countries. Thus, in Poland, a significant number of entrepreneurs are currently obliged to document their sales using an online cash register. In addition, obligatory e-invoicing will probably enter into force in 2024 – as it is currently voluntary.
Corporate income tax
The listed countries look at the essence of taxing corporate profit from very different angles. There is an over 22 percentage points difference between the lowest and highest tax rate:
Germany (31%) and Hungary (9%), with corporate tax rates typically ranging between 15-25% (e.g. Poland and Czech Republic 19%, Austria 25%). Only one country has reduced the profit tax (Greece, from 24% to 22%), but it should be noted that Austria also plans to gradually lower corporate taxes from next year.
The European Union is also making a conscious effort to put brakes on the tax race by drafting a common corporate taxation framework in the member states and preventing the use of the most harmful tax avoidance techniques. An essential tool in this effort is the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) which has been mandatory for the Member States since January 1, 2019. The biggest challenge in recent years for member states has been the adoption of EU regulations, including restrictions on interest deductions. In all EU member states in the region, the previous rules on thin capitalization were increasingly replaced or supplemented by the method tied to the EBITDA-based calculation under the ATAD. The standardization of offshore (controlled foreign corporation, CFC) rules can also be traced back to the ATAD.
CEE countries that apply traditional corporate taxation invariably allow losses incurred in earlier years to be carried forward and offset against a positive tax base in a later year. Still, only five countries allow unrestricted loss carry-forward. The counties also readily apply withholding tax on interest, dividend, and royalty revenues (at a rate of 15%, or even 19-20%), excluding Latvia and Hungary, which still do not impose withholding tax on capital gains. Group corporate taxation is now available in Germany and Hungary; previously, it was only available in Austria, Poland, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The OECD’s BEPS (“Base Erosion and Profit Shifting”) initiative drew attention to the fact that tax authorities need to concentrate more on possible cross-border transactions within corporate groups. By 2022, following the introduction of documentation obligations for large taxpayers in Montenegro, transfer pricing regulations have been in effect in all CEE countries but Moldova. In addition, taxpayers operating in the CEE region also had to participate actively in the CBC reporting system. The OECD’s “country-by-country reporting” (CbCR) aims to improve transparency by making the information needed to assess tax risks available to local tax authorities.
Mazars finds that the biggest challenge regarding transfer pricing in the past year was reacting to the impact of the pandemic. The emerging new crisis upset the reasonably expected profit levels, and multinational corporations had to intervene in their pricing structures. It is still a question how much the tax authorities will scrutinize the Covid hit tax base levels that will fall significantly below those of the pre-pandemic years.
In corporate taxation, the decision by the OECD and the G20 to introduce a global minimum tax forecasts significant changes. The proposal aspires to impose a 15% minimum tax rate on large multinational companies from 2023. Though there may be twists and turns, it is clear that there will be less and less opportunity for multinational companies to lower taxes by shifting profits and eroding their tax base.
“Despite difficult geopolitical and economic situation, the tax policy of the countries of the region has so far been without a major revolution. Compared to the countries of Central and Central and Eastern Europe, Poland does not seem to lag behind in terms of tax policy and current trends, which can be seen i.a. in processes related to digitization.” – concludes Kinga Baran, Partner, Head of Tax at Mazars in Poland.
Mazars is an internationally integrated partnership, specialising in audit, accountancy, advisory, tax and legal services*. Operating in over 90 countries and territories around the world, we draw on the expertise of more than 44,000 professionals – 28,000+ in Mazars’ integrated partnership and 16,000+ via the Mazars North America Alliance – to assist clients of all sizes at every stage in their development.
Mazars has been present on the Polish market for 30 years. The firm employs nearly 400 specialists in Warsaw and Krakow and serves more than 1,000 Polish and international companies of various sizes, offering them a full range of services in the fields of audit, accounting, HR & payroll outsourcing, tax, consulting and financial advisory.
Last Updated on July 26, 2022 by Valeriia Honcharuk